Saturday, January 26, 2008

Alten Nazis sterben allein (Old Nazis die alone)

January 26th, 2008 – Erich Kaestner, the last German WW1 veteran died today at the age of 107. This is not necessarily news considering that life expectancy for a German man living in 2008 is 76 years of age (CIA World Factbook). The outstanding factor in this bit of trivia is that his death, and his career, almost went unnoticed by the German people. It is a governmental policy in the German Bundestag that no records are to be kept about the veterans of past wars. I understand to a point their willful denial of the past yet I can’t help but hypothesize that the national recognition of their veterans would be a good (and necessary) thing.

In 2007, the United-States ‘celebrated’ the death of a WW1 veteran, one of three remaining. That same year, France observed a day of remembrance for the death of the second to last WW1 veteran they had. These events seem to bring people together in a collective effort to construct a national memory. Veterans are citizens who fought in wars that shaped the contemporary world. It is only natural that we integrate them into our heritage, no matter if it be for reasons of honour or notoriety. Some Germans of the new generation (ones born after WW2) feel the same way.

A major national newspaper, Der Spiegel, stated "The German public was within a hair's breadth of never learning of the end of an era,". Another, Die Welt, was more abrupt by denouncing that "The losers hide themselves in a state of self-pity and self denial that they happily try to mitigate by forgetting." (BBC News Service) Perhaps Die Welt (The World) is right, this national ignorance policy may have had a goal when Germany was still trying to prevent a new rise of fascist, communist or generally ultranationalist sentiment yet today, it simply makes fools of the German people. I would bet money that if they revoke the policy, there won’t be a slew of Germans asking ‘I’ve never heard of this Adolf fella, he did WHAT!?’

Mr. Kaestner fought in WW1 and was a Luftwaffe pilot in WW2. He continued on to become a county judge and was awarded many honours for his work. My point is: he was simply a man. More importantly, he was a soldier. His job was to pick up a gun and shoot at the French or pilot his plane and shoot down the British. He did not elaborate sterilization policy regarding the handicapped, he did not send the einsatzgruppen to murder hundreds of thousands of Slavic and Jewish people in southern Poland and he certainly did not personally prepare Hitler’s meals three times a day for 12 years (whilst forgetting to add arsenic). He may have been a tool of evil designs yet I will not blame the hammer when I hit myself on the thumb. I made a choice to use the hammer, I chose what, when and where I was going to use it and I wasn’t careful when I applied it. The German people chose the Nazi party to lead them, it had consequences, and they have to live with it.

In closing, Erich Kaestner has died. For Germany, their defeat in WW1 is now officially only a national memory, whether they want it or not.


(Pictured: German Kaiser Wilhelm II, blamed for WW1 and a boaster of funky mustaches - Erich Kaestner 1900-2008 )

End.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

One year mark and poll results

Good day to all my readers. This very short blog celebrates the one year mark since it began. 38 blog entries and 3000 visitors later, I am the most read English blogger in French Quebec (who isn't part of the official media). I have greatly enjoyed sharing my cynicism with you all and hope to have ruined some of your fun, just as a kid who is told about the fictitious nature of Santa. From Saddam's execution and ridiculous smoking laws to Bear baiting and glowing cats, I look forward to bringing my own style of historical shade to the current events of next year (Don't let me down Putin and Gore!). As I always say, a historian would be a lot less useful if anyone could actually learn from the mistakes of the past. Lucky for me, no one ever does.

As for the 2nd poll of 2007, the leaning tower of Pisa (183 feet tall) has edged out the other competitors (33% of the vote) to become the most overrated world structure. I definitely agree that this structure would be much more subtle and anonymous were it not for the slant.

On the history of that slant, it seems that the land the tower was built on was unstable and the contractors of 1174 AD were as shifty and incompetent as today. One of the tower's side started sinking when construction had only reached the third floor. Instead of fixing the problem, the architects simply built the following floors with the ceilings higher at one end. As a result, the tower actually curves. It was declared a world heritage site in 1987 and petitions to straighten it out in recent years have widely been rejected by the Pisans who know that high rate tourism will stagnate if the visitors can no longer see the biggest architectural mistake in history.

I will now contact the United Nations Records Center to inform them of the Tower's ''most overrated structure on the planet'' prize it has been discerned by my illustrious readers.

(Pictured: Vladimir Putin, my muse - The slanty tower of Pisa)

End.